Irrationality: the enemy within, by Stuart Sutherland

Ebook Download Irrationality: the enemy within, by Stuart Sutherland

Irrationality: The Enemy Within, By Stuart Sutherland. Adjustment your behavior to hang or waste the moment to only talk with your friends. It is done by your everyday, do not you really feel tired? Currently, we will show you the extra routine that, really it’s a very old behavior to do that could make your life more certified. When really feeling burnt out of consistently talking with your close friends all downtime, you could find guide qualify Irrationality: The Enemy Within, By Stuart Sutherland and afterwards read it.

Irrationality: the enemy within, by Stuart Sutherland

Irrationality: the enemy within, by Stuart Sutherland

Irrationality: the enemy within, by Stuart Sutherland

Ebook Download Irrationality: the enemy within, by Stuart Sutherland

How if your day is begun by checking out a publication Irrationality: The Enemy Within, By Stuart Sutherland However, it is in your gizmo? Everybody will certainly still touch and also us their gadget when waking up as well as in morning tasks. This is why, we suppose you to likewise read a publication Irrationality: The Enemy Within, By Stuart Sutherland If you still confused how to obtain guide for your device, you can follow the method here. As below, we offer Irrationality: The Enemy Within, By Stuart Sutherland in this internet site.

How can? Do you believe that you don’t need enough time to opt for buying publication Irrationality: The Enemy Within, By Stuart Sutherland Don’t bother! Simply sit on your seat. Open your gadget or computer system and also be online. You could open up or see the web link download that we offered to obtain this Irrationality: The Enemy Within, By Stuart Sutherland By through this, you could get the on-line book Irrationality: The Enemy Within, By Stuart Sutherland Reading the publication Irrationality: The Enemy Within, By Stuart Sutherland by online could be actually done conveniently by waiting in your computer and also device. So, you can continue each time you have downtime.

Checking out guide Irrationality: The Enemy Within, By Stuart Sutherland by on the internet can be also done conveniently every where you are. It seems that hesitating the bus on the shelter, hesitating the list for line up, or other places possible. This Irrationality: The Enemy Within, By Stuart Sutherland can accompany you because time. It will not make you really feel weary. Besides, through this will additionally boost your life quality.

So, merely be below, locate guide Irrationality: The Enemy Within, By Stuart Sutherland now and check out that quickly. Be the initial to review this publication Irrationality: The Enemy Within, By Stuart Sutherland by downloading and install in the web link. We have some various other publications to review in this web site. So, you could find them also easily. Well, now we have actually done to offer you the best e-book to read today, this Irrationality: The Enemy Within, By Stuart Sutherland is actually suitable for you. Never disregard that you need this book Irrationality: The Enemy Within, By Stuart Sutherland to make much better life. On-line e-book Irrationality: The Enemy Within, By Stuart Sutherland will truly offer very easy of every little thing to review and take the benefits.

Irrationality: the enemy within, by Stuart Sutherland

New, 21st anniversary edition, with a new foreword by Ben Goldacre, author of Bad Science and Bad Pharma, and an afterword by James Ball, covering developments in our understanding of irrationality over the last two decades.

Why do doctors, army generals, high-ranking government officials and other people in positions of power make bad decisions that cause harm to others? Why do prizes serve no useful function? Why are punishments so ineffective? Why is interviewing such an unsatisfactory method of selection?

Irrationality is a challenging and thought-provoking book that draws on statistical concepts, probability theory and a mass of intriguing research to expose the failings of human reasoning, judgement and intuition. The author explores the inconsistencies of human behaviour, and discovers why even the experts find it so hard to make rational and unbiased decisions.

Written with clarity and occasional flashes of wry humour, this classic volume is just as relevant today as when it was first written twenty-one years ago.

  • Sales Rank: #113603 in eBooks
  • Published on: 2013-08-07
  • Released on: 2013-08-07
  • Format: Kindle eBook

Review
Extremely gripping and unusually well written–RICHARD DAWKINS

Terrifying, sometimes comic, very readable and totally enthralling–Oliver Sacks

About the Author
Stuart Sutherland is a former editor with the Dictionary of Canadian Biography.

Most helpful customer reviews

23 of 24 people found the following review helpful.
Shockingly Revealing
By S.B
This book is one of the best researched and put-together books I’ve read in a very long time. I’ve always thought of myself as a rational and scientific. Well, I was wrong! The book is supported by studies and scientific papers all of which are cited and can be examined by the reader. I’m a physician. So, the evidence-based approach works very well for me. However, the book is not as dry as textbooks or articles found in scientific journals. It is also not a self-help book, although it gives a thorough insight about what you’ve considered rational behaviour. Highly recommended.

14 of 16 people found the following review helpful.
Common Sense is irrational
By Kathy
“It gets at the heart of irrational thinking, and how common sense is often based on irrational thinking. It is very impressive how the author has been able to take voluminous amounts of research to build a case on why it is so challenging for humans to think and behave rationally.

4 of 4 people found the following review helpful.
Still a good book on this topic, despite dating to 1992
By Camber
This is a reissue of a 1992 book, and there are now many books available on cognitive biases. But research in this area since 1992 shows that the book is by no means outdated, and the findings Sutherland reports are generally still valid. So I would say that this book remains one of the better books on cognitive biases, because it has an extensive scope, summarizes many studies, and summarizes the conclusions of those studies, all in a style which is quite readable and sometimes entertaining. I can see how some ‘sensitive’ readers might get rubbed the wrong way by Sutherland’s occasional bluntness, but I like the way he gets to the point and doesn’t mince words.

Because the book covers its scope well and I can find no real fault with it, I see no reason to give it less than 5 stars. Here are some key points from the book:

(1) ‘Irrationality’ involves cognitive processes which are prone to result in inaccurate conclusions or suboptimal decisions relative to available evidence and time constraints. So irrationality will often lead to worse outcomes, but not always (‘luck’ is a factor also).

(2) The prevalence of irrationality may be due to our cognitive processes having been evolved for physical and social environments which are different from modern life. So what appears as a problematic ‘bias’ today may have been adaptive in the distant past. But we also need to remember that heuristic shortcuts, though prone to bias and inaccuracy, can also be very effective in many situations, and in the real world we don’t have the luxury of thoroughly analyzing everything (rationality is bounded).

(3) Emotions (which can lead to self-deception and denial), stress, rewards, punishments, and even boredom can contribute to irrationality, but the issue is mostly cognitive.

(4) As situations become more complex, we tend to become more irrational. So taking a more systematic approach to making decisions can be helpful as complexity increases (eg, listing pros and cons of options).

(5) A good grasp of basic statistics can significantly reduce irrationality.

(6) Many cognitive biases are tied to availability bias, which involves latching on to what comes to mind readily. Availability is tied to strong emotions, recency, first impressions, etc. Anecdotes feed availability bias.

(7) The halo effect is when people overgeneralize and infer too much about a person from a few traits, and it can undermine the effectiveness of interviews. It’s generally better to assume that people are a mix of strengths and weaknesses.

(8) Deference to ‘experts’ and other authority figures, and conformity with groups (eg, peer pressure), are natural instincts, and they also provide people with ‘cover’, with the result that they can greatly compromise group effectiveness by promoting groupthink (homogenization of group cognition), increasing risk taking by the group, and even promoting violent group behavior. There can be a vicious cycle here, where group dynamics make groups become increasingly extreme rather than more moderated, and increasingly hostile towards other groups. Contrary to common opinion, sports increase this hostility rather than decreasing it. Groups may also be irrational because of individuals in the group putting their own interest ahead of that of the group in various ways (ingratiating themselves with group leaders, refusing to speak up because it may compromise their position in the group, etc.).

(9) People are often NOT open-minded. We tend to filter and interpret according to what we want to believe, and once someone has a firm belief, presenting them with disconfirming evidence can cause them to rationalize in a way that results in the belief becoming even firmer; we’re good at ‘making up’ explanations for things. This confirmation bias can affect our basic perception and our memory, not just our cognition, and can result in ‘illusory correlation’, where we falsely perceive a relationship between things. So it’s important to sometimes test our beliefs by deliberately trying to falsify them, simultaneously consider multiple competing hypotheses, and consider both positive and negative cases.

(10) Even when correlations are real, it’s important not to mix up cause and effect, nor ignore ‘common causes’ (causes which the correlation between two effects, with neither effect being a cause of the other). When multiple causes contribute to an effect, we sometimes will pick out the most cognitively available one as the dominant cause.

(11) Combining implausible and plausible information tends to make the implausible information and its source appear more plausible and credible.

(12) Anecdotes and small samples are often non-representative of overall trends and can result in incorrect inferences. But beware that even large samples can be biased for various reasons (eg, self-selection bias).

(13) We often fail to recognize that many small probabilities can add up to a large probability in cumulative situations (eg, event risk vs lifetime risk), whereas the probability of an event will be reduced to the extent that a concurrence of factors is needed for the event to occur (ie, joint probability).

(14) A ‘slippery slope’ can be thought of as a process of normalizing deviance.

(15) We generally tend to be more concerned with avoiding losses than making gains. It may be that losses cause more pain than gains cause pleasure. Insurance is an example where we (rationally) take a definite but smaller loss in order to prevent an uncertain but larger loss.

(16) Continuing in an unpromising direction or refusing to cut losses may be due to sunk-cost bias. The remedy is to focus on the future, rather than the past (other than learning from the past).

(17) Offering a substantial reward for performing a task which is inherently pleasant can backfire by causing that task to become devalued. This has implications for education and employee compensation.

(18) People will tend to dislike something more if it’s forced on them rather than freely chosen.

(19) Punishing children, and neglecting them when they cry, are strategies which usually backfire.

(20) We have some bias towards short-term focus, often to the detriment of our long-term interests.

(21) The way questions, situations, and options are framed can dramatically (and irrationally) influence what decisions are made. The ‘power of suggestion’ exploits this, and the ‘anchoring bias’ is an example of this.

(22) Overconfidence bias can result in our overestimating our ability to make predictions about the future and overestimating our knowledge and skill in general, as well as the hindsight bias of thinking that we would have made a better prediction or decision in the past than someone else did. Hindsight bias is also driven by inaccurate memories of past events, as well as our knowledge of actual outcomes and our ability to generate causal explanations (which may not be accurate), which can lead us away from considering alternative possible outcomes. Hindsight bias can inhibit our learning from the past and thus prevent recurrence of mistakes. ‘Experts’ are as prone to these biases as anyone else, and in some cases more prone to them.

(23) We tend to take personal credit for successes, while blaming situations for our failures. But we tend to take the opposite views with the successes and failures of others. And we tend to assume that other people are more similar to us than they actually are.

(24) Bad ergonomic design (eg, instrumentation layout) can contribute to human errors and failures. Designers need to account for the limitations and tendencies of human operators, including how operators may change their behavior in unexpected ways in response to changes in system design.

(25) Risk assessment can be extraordinarily difficult with complex systems. And risks which are insidiously ‘spread out’ in time and space tend to be taken less seriously than risks which can cause a concentrated loss, even though the former may represent a much higher overall risk.

(26) Our bounded rationality and need to satisfice can lead to irrationality in various ways, such as our neglecting major factors and/or overweighting minor factors when making decisions. On a broader level, we may also spend too little time on major decisions and too much time on minor decisions.

(27) ‘Regression to the mean’ is the tendency for extreme events to be most likely followed by events which are less extreme, rather than comparably or more extreme. It’s therefore irrational to expect that extreme events will continue in the same extreme direction, or to be surprised when they don’t.

(28) Our intuition/judgment is often less accurate than formal analysis, even though we tend to be (over)confident about our intuition/judgment. But the judgment of groups is usually (not always!) better than that of individuals, since errors tend to cancel out in groups. Boredom, fatigue, illness, and situational distractions can all compromise judgment. This issue applies to interviewing as well, so formal testing is a useful interviewing method.

(29) The perceived marginal benefit of money tends to decrease as we have more money.

(30) We tend to not accurately predict how we will feel emotionally in situations we haven’t previously experienced (eg, marriage, career change, relocation, etc.).

(31) Irrationality can be reduced by working hard to make a habit of rationality.

See all 15 customer reviews…

Irrationality: the enemy within, by Stuart Sutherland PDF
Irrationality: the enemy within, by Stuart Sutherland EPub
Irrationality: the enemy within, by Stuart Sutherland Doc
Irrationality: the enemy within, by Stuart Sutherland iBooks
Irrationality: the enemy within, by Stuart Sutherland rtf
Irrationality: the enemy within, by Stuart Sutherland Mobipocket
Irrationality: the enemy within, by Stuart Sutherland Kindle

Irrationality: the enemy within, by Stuart Sutherland PDF

Irrationality: the enemy within, by Stuart Sutherland PDF

Irrationality: the enemy within, by Stuart Sutherland PDF
Irrationality: the enemy within, by Stuart Sutherland PDF

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *